On August 5, 2025, as rescue teams deploy “on a war footing” to pull bodies from the debris-choked ruins of Dharali village, India confronts an uncomfortable truth. The mountains we call divine are systematically murdering those who come seeking their blessings—and we are paying four times more to count the corpses than to prevent their creation.
Divine Punishment or Human Stupidity? The Body Count Speaks
On August 5, 2025, the Kheer Ganga River became a river of death, carrying muddy torrents that swept away multi-storey buildings in Dharali village, killing at least five people and leaving more than 50 missing. The terrifying footage—walls of debris-laden water devouring homes while pilgrims fled in panic—represents more than another “natural” disaster. It epitomizes the lethal mathematics of India’s religious tourism model, where 80% of disaster funds (₹54,770 crore) go to post-catastrophe response while only 20% (₹13,693 crore) is allocated for prevention.
The summer of 2025 has written its obituary in mountain blood. Since June 20, Himachal Pradesh alone has witnessed 63 deaths and 40 missing persons from rain-related incidents, while total monsoon casualties across the region have reached 170 lives lost with economic damages exceeding ₹1,59,981 lakh. These are not acts of divine wrath—they are the predictable consequences of systematically ignoring environmental limits in pursuit of religious commerce.
In Mandi district, 11 cloudbursts and 4 flash floods occurred within just 15 hours on June 30-July 1, killing 4 and leaving 16 missing. Over 400 pilgrims required rescue via zipline from the Kinnaur Kailash Yatra route as flash floods washed away trekking paths. Each rescue operation costs crores in emergency deployment while the infrastructure failures that necessitated these rescues could have been prevented for fractions of those amounts.
This represents the moral bankruptcy of a system that finds infinite money for helicopter evacuations but claims poverty when asked to invest in slope stabilization, early warning systems, or sustainable infrastructure. We are literally paying more to extract pilgrims from disasters than to prevent those disasters from occurring.
The 2025 disasters are not outliers—they are the culmination of systematic policy failures that prioritize post-disaster spectacle over pre-disaster prevention. The 2023 monsoon season alone killed 404 people across Himachal Pradesh with economic losses exceeding ₹12,000 crore, yet subsequent infrastructure development continued unchanged, as if these deaths were acceptable collateral damage for maintaining tourism revenue.
Yet policy responses remain trapped in reactive cycles. Despite Himachal Pradesh lobbying for ₹9,000 crore in disaster recovery funds based on Post-Disaster Needs Assessment, the Ministry of Home Affairs released only ₹2,000 crore in June 2025. Meanwhile, the state has become India’s third most debt-stressed region specifically because it lacks resources for both disaster prevention and recovery.
The Kedarnath precedent should have ended this madness permanently. The site that safely accommodated 5 lakh pilgrims in 2012 now struggles under 25 lakh annual visitors—more than triple its ecological carrying capacity. This is not pilgrimage; it is environmental suicide with religious justification.
The Economics of Death: Prevention vs. Profit
The financial arithmetic of Himalayan destruction reveals the corrupt priorities of religious tourism policy. Current analysis demonstrates that approximately 80% of tourism revenue flows to national and international hotel chains, corporate tour operators, and external service providers, while local communities receive only 20% through low-wage employment. Meanwhile, India’s National Disaster Response Management Fund allocates 80% for post-disaster response and only 20% for prevention and mitigation.
This creates a lethal economic feedback loop: the more pilgrims arrive, the greater the environmental damage and disaster risk, but the benefits accrue to entities with no long-term stake in the region’s survival. When disasters strike, the costs—human casualties, infrastructure destruction, cultural disruption—are socialized while the profits remain privatized.
Consider the perverse economics: a traditional Pahari homestay uses approximately 10,000 liters of water daily compared to 200,000 liters for a large hotel, while providing more authentic cultural experiences and creating direct economic incentives for environmental conservation. Yet policy continues to favor large-scale infrastructure that maximizes short-term revenue while guaranteeing long-term catastrophe.
The Cultural Casualty Assessment
The commodification of pilgrimage has transformed profound spiritual practices into death-defying consumer experiences. Videos of pilgrims running before being engulfed by dark waves of debris that uprooted entire multistorey buildings represent the logical endpoint of treating sacred geography as entertainment infrastructure.
Traditional crafts like Aipan art and woolen shawl weaving—expressions of indigenous mountain culture that once provided economic sustenance to local communities—are disappearing as mass tourism creates demand for cheap, mass-produced souvenirs rather than authentic cultural products. Meanwhile, the communities that created these traditions flee their ancestral lands as climate disasters make mountain residence increasingly untenable.
This represents cultural genocide disguised as religious enthusiasm: extracting the surface symbols of tradition while destroying the underlying social and environmental systems that sustained those traditions across centuries.
The Prevention-Relief Scandal: A Moral Accounting
The most damning evidence of policy failure lies in India’s disaster spending priorities. Out of ₹68,463 crore allocated for disaster management (2021-26), ₹54,770 crore (80%) goes to response while only ₹13,693 crore (20%) is designated for prevention. This represents a deliberate choice to prioritize expensive post-disaster heroics over cost-effective prevention strategies.
The human cost of this accounting is measurable in body counts: 170 lives lost in Himachal Pradesh by August 2025, with ₹1,59,981 lakh in economic damages. The 2023 North India floods killed at least 330 people in Himachal Pradesh alone, with ₹10,000 crore in damages. Each death represents a prevention failure that could have been avoided through proper investment in early warning systems, sustainable infrastructure, and capacity management.
Emergency rescue operations deploy armies and helicopters at costs exceeding ₹50 lakh per incident, while basic slope stabilization projects cost ₹10-15 lakh per vulnerable site. We are choosing to spend five times more on dramatic rescues than on preventing the need for those rescues.
The Pilgrimage Classification Imperative
Addressing this crisis requires abandoning the fiction that all religious tourism serves equivalent spiritual purposes. A rational classification system must distinguish between genuine spiritual seekers and recreational religious consumers, creating differentiated access policies that prioritize authentic pilgrimage while managing casual visitation.
Such a system might categorize visitors as spiritual pilgrims (primarily elderly individuals seeking moksha, deserving priority access and subsidized rates), religious tourists (general visitors subject to quota systems and market-rate pricing), and cultural tourists (leisure-focused visitors with restricted shrine access but enhanced cultural programming through replica sites and virtual darshan platforms).
This is not discrimination—it is disaster management. Just as hospitals triage patients based on need severity, pilgrimage sites must prioritize access based on spiritual intent and environmental impact.
The Homestay Revolution as Survival Strategy
The transition from corporate hotel dominance to community-based homestays represents more than tourism policy reform—it is literally a matter of life and death for mountain communities. International precedents demonstrate viable alternatives: Bhutan’s high-value, low-volume tourism strategy has maintained carbon-negative status while generating sustainable revenue, and Japan’s Kumano Kodo pilgrimage routes utilize homestay networks that have earned UNESCO recognition.
Economic projections suggest this approach could support 200,000 homestay units by 2030, generating direct local income of ₹10,000 crore annually while creating 5 lakh jobs in traditional crafts and cultural services. More critically, community-based tourism creates economic incentives for environmental protection rather than environmental destruction.
Technology as Disaster Prevention
Virtual darshan platforms and “Mini Dham” replica sites in plains regions could serve the spiritual needs of casual devotees while reducing pressure on fragile mountain ecosystems. This is not spiritual compromise—it is disaster prevention disguised as technological innovation.
Just as live television broadcasts of religious ceremonies serve millions of devotees unable to attend physically, virtual and replica experiences can satisfy devotional needs while preserving actual sacred sites for serious spiritual practitioners who understand that authentic pilgrimage involves accepting natural limits.
The Moral Imperative for Immediate Action
The choice facing India is stark: continue the current path toward systematic environmental and cultural destruction punctuated by increasingly deadly disasters, or implement immediate restrictions on mass religious tourism despite commercial opposition.
The August 5 Uttarakhand disaster disrupted connectivity to Gangotri Dham and impacted the Char Dham Yatra with rain-triggered landslides and flash floods. This disruption will occur with increasing frequency and lethality until policy recognizes that environmental limits cannot be negotiated through devotional intensity.
The implementation must begin immediately with emergency capacity caps at all major Himalayan pilgrimage sites, mandatory environmental impact assessments for all new tourism infrastructure, and complete construction bans within 10 kilometers of major shrines. These measures will face political resistance, but the alternative is accepting predictable mass casualties every monsoon season.
The Himalayas that witnessed the composition of texts proclaiming the fundamental interconnectedness of all existence now witness the systematic violation of those principles through policies that prioritize commerce over conservation, profit over prevention, and religious theatre over spiritual authenticity.
As rescue teams continue searching for survivors in Dharali’s mud-filled ruins, India must confront whether it will choose sustainable transformation or continue accepting mass casualties as the price of religious commerce. The current trajectory leads to the systematic destruction of both the landscapes that inspired India’s spiritual traditions and the communities that maintain access to them.
The time for such recognition is not later—it is now, before the next cloudburst turns more pilgrims into statistics and more sacred sites into disaster zones.
About The Author
