WhatsApp groups explode with stray dog debates while a gold medalist’s rabies death goes unnoticed. Delhi’s Supreme Court verdict to relocate thousands of strays has ignited passion but exposed India’s spectacular failure in managing both policy and priorities. Who’s really lost here?
Champions Die in Silence, Dogs Trend in Noise
Welcome to India’s latest “barking mad” controversy—quite literally. Post the Supreme Court’s August 12, 2025 directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR streets, the nation has descended into what can only be called “dogmatic pandemonium.” WhatsApp groups are experiencing their own version of “rabid” debates, with dog lovers sharing tear-jerking videos of strays being “cruelly rounded up,” while anxious parents post photos of children’s bandaged wounds.
Yet, in this cacophony of digital activism, there was deafening silence when Brijesh Solanki, a 22-year-old gold medal-winning Kabaddi player from Uttar Pradesh, died an agonizing death from rabies in July 2025. The young athlete had rescued a puppy from a drain, suffered a bite, but never sought vaccination—mistaking his deteriorating condition for routine sports injuries. Where were the viral forwards then? Where was the collective outrage when a promising life was snuffed out by a preventable disease?
The Regulatory Paradox: A Tale of Two Populations
This selective activism exposes India’s spectacular failure in managing both stray and pet dog populations. While 62 million free-ranging dogs roam Indian streets, the pet dog population has surged to 30 million, growing 10-15% annually alongside a Rs 300 crore industry projected to double by 2030.
The irony is staggering—as authorities struggle with strays, India simultaneously fuels demand for purebred pets through largely unregulated breeding operations and pet shops. This regulatory schizophrenia allows abandoned pets to swell stray populations while failing to address root causes. Perhaps the dogs are wondering: “You buy us as puppies from fancy stores, abandon us when we’re inconvenient, then debate whether we deserve to live on the streets we never chose.”
Parliamentary data reveals over 3.7 million dog bite cases and 54 suspected rabies deaths in 2024, with other estimates suggesting nearly double these figures. Delhi alone accounts for roughly 2,000 dog bite cases daily. A comprehensive 2022-23 community survey estimated 5,726 annual human rabies deaths in India, with 20.5% of dog bite victims never receiving anti-rabies vaccination.
These aren’t mere statistics—they represent shattered families, dreams destroyed, and a public health system failing its most vulnerable citizens.
From Streets to Supreme Court: The Legal Journey
The matter reached the Supreme Court as a suo motu case initiated on July 28, 2025, following mounting reports of stray dog attacks. The bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan characterized the situation as “extremely grim,” emphasizing that “infants and young children, not at any cost, should fall prey of rabies.”
The court was responding to increasing incidents where dog packs had mauled children, with Indian media regularly reporting such attacks. The trigger was the accumulation of tragic cases where preventable rabies deaths, particularly among children, had reached alarming proportions.
The Court’s Verdict: Relocation, Not Rehabilitation
The Supreme Court ordered authorities to immediately capture 5,000 stray dogs from “high-risk areas” within six to eight weeks, housing them in shelters equipped with adequate staff and CCTV surveillance. Critically, no captured animal should be released back onto streets. The court warned of “strictest action” against anyone obstructing the capture drive, with Justice Pardiwala stating, “If any individual or organisation comes in the way of picking stray dogs or rounding them up, we will proceed to take action against any such resistance.”
The Feasibility Phantom: Economic and Ecological Impossibility
Meneka Gandhi’s Reality Check: Former Union Minister Meneka Gandhi delivered perhaps the most damning critique: “You have three lakh dogs in Delhi. To get them all off the roads, you’ll have to make 3,000 pounds, each with drainage, water, a shed, a kitchen, and a watchman. That will cost about Rs 15,000 crore.” She calculated that feeding the impounded dogs would require Rs 5 crore weekly, calling it “a very strange judgment given by someone who is in anger. Angry judgments are never sensible.”
Ecological Disruption: Gandhi warned of unintended consequences: “Within 48 hours, three lakh dogs will come from Ghaziabad, Faridabad because there’s food in Delhi. And once you remove the dogs, monkeys will come on the ground.” Stray dogs maintain urban ecological balance by controlling rat populations and other pests—a service they provide free of charge, without demanding government salaries or pension benefits.
Community Hearts vs. Court Orders
In middle-class neighbourhoods, many Delhi strays are beloved by residents despite lacking formal owners, with some dogs clothed in special jackets during winter. Communities think of neighborhood dogs as family members, making forced removal emotionally traumatic for both animals and caregivers.
This emotional bond represents years of coexistence, feeding routines, and informal adoption relationships that the court order obliterates overnight.
The Buddhist Kingdom of Bhutan became the world’s first country to achieve 100% street dog sterilization after a 14-year program with Humane Society International. They sterilized and vaccinated over 150,000 street dogs and microchipped 32,000 pets, investing approximately $3.55 million. Are we listening ?
PETA’s Scientific Opposition
PETA India has condemned the directive as “unscientific,” “impractical,” and “illogical.” Dr. Mini Aravindan, PETA’s Senior Director of Veterinary Affairs, argues that “displacement has never worked” and would create “chaos and suffering for both animals and communities.”
PETA emphasizes that Delhi has around 10 lakh community dogs with less than half sterilized, making sheltering all dogs unfeasible. They advocate for urgent sterilization programs, closure of illegal pet shops, and encouragement of adoption from shelters instead.
Success Stories: When Science Meets Compassion
Goa’s Rabies-Free Achievement: World Veterinary Service’s Mission Rabies successfully vaccinated and sterilized 70% of dogs in Goa, making it India’s first rabies-free state. This demonstrates that systematic vaccination works where displacement fails—proving that dogs and humans can coexist when science guides policy rather than panic.
Bhutan’s Golden Standard: The Buddhist Kingdom of Bhutan became the world’s first country to achieve 100% street dog sterilization after a 14-year program with Humane Society International. They sterilized and vaccinated over 150,000 street dogs and microchipped 32,000 pets, investing approximately $3.55 million.
Bhutan’s success involved training dozens of veterinarians, engaging 11,000+ volunteers, and careful phased implementation. The program aligned with Buddhist values of compassion while achieving remarkable public health outcomes.
Regional Realities: A Subcontinent Divided
Pakistan continues relying on culling, killing over 50,000 dogs annually, with Lahore alone killing 27,576 dogs in 2009. Bangladesh faced criticism in 2020 for relocating 30,000 stray dogs outside Dhaka. Sri Lanka maintains a no-kill policy, emphasizing neutering and vaccination, though implementation remains inconsistent.
The contrast is stark: while Bhutan chose the path of scientific compassion, most South Asian nations continue with knee-jerk reactions that solve nothing while perpetuating suffering.
Latest Developments: The Three-Judge Bench and A Voice of Balance
In a significant turn of events that reflects the controversy’s complexity, the Supreme Court has referred the Delhi-NCR stray dog matter to a three-judge bench for a hearing scheduled for August 14, 2025. The new bench will include Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, and N.V. Anjaria, suggesting that the apex court recognizes the need for broader judicial wisdom on this contentious issue.
This development came after Chief Justice of India B R Gavai said the court would “look into” the matter after a lawyer referred to a 2024 Supreme Court ruling by Justice J K Maheshwari that prohibited the killing of stray animals and underscored compassion towards all living beings as a constitutional value.
Amidst this legal recalibration, actor and known animal lover Randeep Hooda has offered a voice of balanced pragmatism that captures the nation’s dilemma perfectly. Welcoming the Supreme Court’s decision to review its verdict, Hooda emphasized both sides of this complex issue: “I love animals but will I be able to justify it to a family that has lost a loved one to rabies or dealt with serious injuries?”
His statement resonates with painful truth: “Are stray dogs our collective community humanitarian responsibility and, at times, a public safety concern?” This question cuts through the emotional rhetoric to address what policymakers have consistently avoided—acknowledging that both human lives and animal welfare matter, and that sustainable solutions must protect both.
Food for Thought: The Mirror of Our Humanity
As Delhi grapples with a potentially unenforceable directive now under judicial review, perhaps we should pause and reflect on what this entire episode reveals about us as a society. We live in a nation where a gold medalist’s preventable death from rabies generates no viral outrage, yet a court order about dog relocation sets WhatsApp ablaze. We build a Rs 300 crore pet industry while allowing 62 million strays to suffer on streets. We demand immediate solutions to complex problems, then wonder why quick fixes fail.
About The Author
